rocketlasas.blogg.se

Intel power gadget mac crash
Intel power gadget mac crash








intel power gadget mac crash
  1. #Intel power gadget mac crash 64 Bit#
  2. #Intel power gadget mac crash pro#
  3. #Intel power gadget mac crash series#

Extremely pleased with this machine.Įxactly. The good news is my M1 Macbook Air is using around 10% of its CPU. The GUI/mixer everything is buttery smooth. There is compression EQ delays reverbs virtual amps etc. This includes Logic's Drummer tracks (in a summing track) etc. I have like 10 alternatives now in the session and trying out different guitar sounds so I'm hiding tracks etc. I am currently working on a rock song with a friend, collaborating overseas. It's really easy to swallow up the tracks. Easy to get high track counts for that stuff too, although not as high as film.Īnd in the middle there are fusion bands and world music with choirs and tens of percussion players or multi-miked drum kits. But probably only two mics.įor pop/rock/country, stuff gets shipped around as stems - 5-10 takes per instrument. In the 1960's, you needed an orchestra, and a hall. So not all tracks are sounding at the same time, but the VIs are loaded and ready to play on multiple articulations. Lots of people who do film / orchestral composition need 70-80 tracks for each 'articulation' - a whole orchestra (or more normally just a string section) playing legato, or pizzicato, or tremolo. Even the Beatles linked two 4-tracks together. Technology is one of the things that changes - it's musicians as well as engineers who push the boundaries of technology, in order to find new, novel sounds.

intel power gadget mac crash

Music now doesn't sound like it did in the 1960's. I don't think I've ever used more than 27, tops, VIs and audio. Who, other than film/orchestral composers needs that many tracks? I don't. I wonder if they're just adding audio/midi tracks without duplicating all the plug-ins? Who knows. I found another video of someone managing 309 tracks on their 16-core MP 2019.

#Intel power gadget mac crash series#

Using a 10 Core 11 series processor at 5GHz on every core will be very close to your 16 Core Xeon. Xeons are made for stability not performance.

#Intel power gadget mac crash pro#

Oddly enough the Pro is correct, with 105 tracks.īut 180 tracks with the 16 core xeon is pretty good. The numbers posted on music-prod are wrong.įor example, the Air says 110 there, but in reality, it is 94/95 tracks. Now, since the 16Core is 20% faster than your 12, according to geek bench, it is 130 x 1.2, which is, 168, which means 180 is actually very realistic and good. My 9900k is OCd to run at 5.1 GHz on all cores during AVX and it is the same speed as the 12 Core Mac Pro from 2019, doing 140 tracks. I dunno, 180 tracks sound pretty good for 16 cores of that Intel Type processor, given my 9900k manages around 130 to 140, tracks, which is akin to a 12 Core Pro 2019. So, any clues please? Do I just have a lazy CPU ? When I run the Intel power gadget, my single core turbo boost performance won't go above 4.23GHz, and when the Logic benchmark is running, iStat Menus tells me that CPU frequency is 3.9GHz, which seems reasonable for all cores going flat out. I can uninstall them and see if it helps, but I bet it won't! Things that are also present but can't be quit are: CCC, Avast, MalwareBytes. Quitting istat menus (and killing all the processes) doesn't help, neither does removing Dropbox, iDrive and TGPro, which are about all I have running. Logic's CPU meter maxes out at 100% on all cores except the last (as expected) but iStat menus tells me the CPU is running at about 84-86%. I used 32 threads but 'automatic' doesn't change the result much either,

#Intel power gadget mac crash 64 Bit#

Mixer precision is set to 64 bit and I get a few more track at 32 bit (about 190) and buffer is set to medium. Machine is a Mac Pro 7.1 16 core 48GB RAM 1TB SSDīuffer is set to 1024 (although I get almost identical results at 32) and I tried both Mac Pro speaker and Babyface Pro as output device. I only get about 180 tracks with the benchmark, and I've seen reports of 235 and 260 with other 16 core users. I know this thread is mostly about M1 performance (and I recently tried an M1 Air and got 95 tracks with the benchmark) but my problem is with the Mac Pro 16 core.










Intel power gadget mac crash